|
WASHINGTON - Although
it will take weeks, if not months, to sort out precisely who was
responsible for what increasingly appears to have been the systemic abuse
by U.S. soldiers of Iraqi detainees, it should be no surprise if
Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith is found to have played
an important role.
Feith, who,
according to Bob Woodward's new book, 'Plan of Attack', was described by
the military commander who led last year's invasion, Gen Tommie Franks, as
''the f---ing stupidest guy on the face of the earth'', has been at the
center of virtually everything else that has gone wrong in Iraq, so there
is no reason to think he was very far from this one.
|

US Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith
(AFP/File/Janek Skarzynski) |
It was his office,
for example, that created shortly after 9/11 the Counter Terrorism
Evaluation Group and the Office of Special Plans (OSP) which re-assessed
12 years of raw intelligence and the Arab press, to find evidence of ties
between the regime of former Iraq President Saddam Hussein and the
al-Qaeda terrorist group.
The OSP then ''stovepiped''
that information, unvetted by professional intelligence analysts, straight
to Vice President Dick Cheney's office for use by the White House.
Similarly, it was
Feith's office, along with the Defense Policy Group (DPG) whose members
Feith appointed, that served as the point of entry and influence for Iraqi
National Congress (INC) chief Ahmed Chalabi and his ''defectors'' who
provided phony intelligence about Hussein's vast stockpiles of weapons of
mass destruction (WMD).
It was Feith's
office that was charged with planning the post-war occupation and
reconstruction process, and, in so doing, effectively excluded input from
Iraqi experts from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), and even from the Iraqi-American community, who had participated in
a mammoth project that anticipated most of the problems occupation
authorities have since encountered.
And it was Feith's
office that also housed the future undersecretary for intelligence,
Stephen Cambone, who facilitated the transfer of Maj Gen Geoffrey Miller,
the commander of the Guantanamo Bay detention camp that houses suspected
al-Qaeda and Taliban prisoners, to Abu Ghraib prison in the interests of
extracting more intelligence from detainees there about the fast-growing
insurgency in Iraq.
Both Cambone and
Miller, who brought high-pressure interrogation tactics barred by the
Geneva Conventions with him from Guantanamo, are considered prime targets
of ongoing congressional investigations into the prisoner abuse scandal.
But the
announcement Tuesday by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John
Warner that he is seeking testimony in the coming weeks from Feith may
have unwittingly cast new light on the reasons why Secretary of State
Colin Powell is alleged by Woodward to have referred to Feith's operation
as the ''Gestapo Office''.
Evidence of Feith's
involvement in the prisoner abuse scandal rests primarily on reports that
have appeared in 'Newsweek', the 'New York Times', and the 'Los Angeles
Times'. They have reported that, even before the Iraq War, top officials
in the Pentagon, acting on the advice of civilian lawyers, authorized a
reinterpretation of the Geneva Conventions to permit tougher methods of
interrogation of prisoners of war (POWs).
This effort was
strongly resisted by Powell, a retired army general, when it came to his
attention, and by the Judge Advocates Generals (JAG) Corps, the formal
name given to the military's lawyers. They argued, among other things,
that the introduction of ''stress and duress'' techniques, sleep
deprivation and other methods that violate the Conventions would not only
result in dubious intelligence, but could also be cited as a precedent for
use against U.S. soldiers who fell into enemy hands.
Dissenters,
however, were essentially excluded from the discussion, and, according to
'Newsweek', new techniques were formally approved during the Iraq invasion
in April 2003, although Feith's immediate superior, Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz testified last week he was unaware of such a
decision.
At the same time,
senior Pentagon officials also authorized the exclusion of JAG officers
from observing interrogations to ensure they complied with the
Conventions. That was a major departure from the practice in the 1991 Gulf
War, when JAG officers were present in all interrogation facilities and
could intercede if they witnessed violations of the Conventions.
Even after the new
orders came down, senior JAG officers did not give up. According to a
number of accounts, a delegation of officers contacted Scott Horton, a
former high-ranking JAG officer and chairman of the Committee on
International Human Rights of the New York City Bar Association, to see if
he and like-minded attorneys would intervene.
''They were
extremely upset'', Horton told the 'Los Angeles Times'. ''They said they
were being shut out of the process, and that the civilian political
lawyers, not the military lawyers, were writing these new rules of
engagement.''
According to
Horton, the JAG officers identified the main forces behind loosening the
rules as Feith and the Pentagon's general counsel, William Haynes, another
political appointee.
''If we -- 'we'
being the uniformed lawyers -- had been listened to, and what we said put
into practice, then these abuses would not have occurred'', Rear Adm Don
Guter, the Navy JAG from 2000 to 2002, told ABCNews.
Feith, who was also
interviewed by ABC, denied there was any disagreement from JAG officers
concerning rules and practices authorized by his office, but the issue is
unlikely to rest with his word alone.
Indeed, the
accounts given by JAG officers are fully consistent with what is already
known about Feith's policy-making practices. As with the pre-war
intelligence and pre-war planning for the occupation, the experts and
professionals were either circumvented or systematically excluded from
participating in the policy process, so that civilian ideologues with
ideas about how to extract information from uncooperative Arabs, for
example, would not have to address informed criticism before plunging
ahead.
Like his mentor,
former Defense Policy Board Chairman Richard Perle, Feith has long been a
hardliner on foreign policy, arms control issues and Israel.
As a youth, his
father, Dalck Feith, was active in pre-World War II Poland in Betar, a
militantly Zionist movement and forerunner of Israel's Likud Party. His
parents perished in the Nazi Holocaust, according to the neo-conservative
'Wall Street Journal', which last week demanded a public apology from
Powell for his reference to Feith's operation as the ''Gestapo Office''.
Feith worked for
Perle in the Pentagon under Ronald Reagan, and the two teamed up in the
late 1980s to lobby on behalf of the Turkish government and build military
ties between Turkey and Israel. In 1996 he participated in a private study
by a right-wing Israeli think tank that called for ousting Saddam Hussein
as a means to transform the balance of power in the Middle East in such a
way that Israel could ignore pressure to trade ''land for peace'' with the
Palestinians or Syria.
In 1997, Feith
argued in 'Commentary' magazine for Israel to re-occupy the Occupied
Territories and repudiate the Oslo accords, and the following year he
signed an open letter to then-President Bill Clinton calling for
Washington work with Chalabi's INC to oust Hussein.
© Copyright 2004 IPS -
Inter Press Service
### |